Picture this: Penn State shakes up the college football world by parting ways with their head coach James Franklin just as the season hits a 3-3 record. It's the kind of move that sets the coaching carousel spinning wildly, and who knows, it might not be the only big shake-up we see this recruiting cycle. But here's the real kicker—where does this open spot at Penn State really stack up in the Big Ten conference and across the nation? Former Alabama standout and current FOX Sports analyst Mark Ingram thinks it's not as glamorous as you might expect, and his take sparked a lively back-and-forth with ex-coach Urban Meyer. It's a debate that's sure to divide fans and experts alike—stick around, because this is where opinions really clash!
Mark Ingram, the guy who once dominated college football as a Crimson Tide running back, shared his candid thoughts on the Triple Option podcast. He bluntly called the Penn State gig the fourth or fifth best job in the Big Ten, ranking it behind heavyweights like Ohio State, Michigan, Oregon, and USC. 'Should it be higher?' he pondered, clearly surprised by his own assessment. For beginners diving into college football rankings, think of it like this: These programs aren't just teams—they're powerhouses with massive recruiting advantages, alumni bases, and histories of success that draw top talent and coaches like magnets.
Urban Meyer, the legendary coach who knows a thing or two about building programs, didn't hold back in questioning that lineup. He zeroed in on one name that really stood out: Michigan. 'But should it be higher?' Meyer shot back, challenging Ingram's view. 'The question is: Is it a better job than the Wolverines? Look at their records over the last 25 years. There might be an argument, I don't know that. That's something I think every fan's got to ask themselves.' And this is the part most people miss—the Wolverines have been a consistent force, churning out wins and national contenders, while Penn State has had ups and downs. It's a classic case of comparing apples to oranges, where tradition and recent performance collide in a way that could fuel endless debates among loyal supporters.
Ingram wasn't about to back down. He quickly countered by pointing out Penn State's unique hurdles—yes, the program has incredible resources, a passionate fanbase, and all the tools a coach could dream of, but there's a significant catch that makes it tricky. For context, imagine trying to recruit top players to a place that's not exactly a sunny paradise year-round; it's not unique to Penn State in the Big Ten, but it's a real factor. 'I think the location is a challenge for people,' Ingram explained. This subtle jab highlights a controversial point: In an era where coaches and recruits prioritize lifestyle and climate, could a state's weather and vibe really impact a program's prestige? It's the kind of counterpoint that might surprise you—after all, football glory often overshadows these everyday realities.
Meyer took a moment to mull over the other programs Ingram had listed as superior. Take Oregon, for example—they're swimming in Nike endorsements and sponsorship dollars, turning their athletic department into a financial juggernaut. Ohio State? Well, that's a no-brainer with its storied history and massive stadium crowds. And Michigan, as Meyer noted, is right there in the mix, potentially flip-flopping with Penn State depending on who you ask. 'Then USC, is USC bumped?' Meyer wondered aloud, clearly impressed. 'In my mind USC is a top three job in America, so I would say yes. Now they've had a couple decades drought out there, so...' It's fascinating how a program's dry spell can reshape opinions, isn't it? For those new to this, think of USC's recent struggles as a reminder that even elite teams face slumps that test their allure.
Ingram jumped in to defend his original stance. 'That's why I said Penn State is fourth or fifth, it just depends,' he clarified, keeping the focus on the Big Ten landscape. But Meyer, ever the advocate for elevating Penn State, shifted the conversation to a national perspective—because, let's face it, the Nittany Lions will be vying for coaches from across the country. 'So nationally that would probably put them just inside the top 10, right Mark?' Meyer pressed. Ingram agreed, with a twist: 'Yes. But available jobs it is top right now.' In other words, while the ranking might fluctuate, this vacancy is hot right now in the open market. It's a subtle nod to the fluidity of coaching hires, where timing and desperation can turn a 'fourth-place' job into a must-have opportunity.
This whole exchange leaves us with so many thought-provoking questions: Do you think Penn State's location truly drags down its prestige, or is it just an excuse for mediocrity? Is Michigan's consistent record enough to edge out Penn State, or should recent performances weigh more heavily? And what about those national rankings—does placing USC among the elite despite a drought change how you view program evaluations? We'd love to hear your take—agree with Ingram's ranking, side with Meyer's push for more credit, or offer a completely different angle? Drop your thoughts in the comments below and let's keep the conversation going!
Get the Daily On3 Newsletter in your inbox every morning
By clicking 'Subscribe to Newsletter', I agree to On3's Privacy Notice (https://www.on3.com/page/privacy-policy/), Terms (https://www.on3.com/page/terms-of-service/), and use of my personal information described therein.
